House bill · 115th Congress · Did not become law
To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to recognize the exposure-reducing nature of client margin for cleared derivatives.
Open in Bill Explorer →Where it went
- IntroducedDec 14, 2017
- Committee actionMar 21, 2018
- Passed House—
- Passed Senate—
- To the President—
- Became law—
Latest action: Aug 3, 2018 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 680.
Cost and committee reports
Official records Congress.gov attaches to H.R. 4659.
- CBO cost estimateThe Congressional Budget Office published “H.R. 4659, a bill to require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to recognize the exposure-reducing nature of client margin for cleared derivatives” on June 11, 2018. CBO’s description reads “As ordered reported by the House Committee on Financial Services on March 21, 2018”.Read the CBO estimate ↗Source: Congressional Budget Office, June 11, 2018 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- cboCostEstimates
- CBO publication
- https://www.cbo.gov/publication/54030
- CBO publication date
- June 11, 2018
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 4659, 115th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/115/hr/4659
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- December 5, 2025
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 21, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
b348f346594d82e7e75da870d16cb8ee1d3519739e8dc3f4126c5512e3959d12
PORKER links to the estimate and does not repeat its dollar figures. Each estimate is for the version of the bill its description names; the bill may have changed since.
- Committee reportCongress.gov lists 1 committee report for this bill: H. Rept. 115-882 ↗. The Congress.gov committee record lists a “Reported By” entry for the Financial Services Committee on August 3, 2018.Source: Congress.gov, reported August 3, 2018 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- committeeReports
- Report API records
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/committee-report/115/HRPT/882
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 4659, 115th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/115/hr/4659
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- December 5, 2025
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 21, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
b348f346594d82e7e75da870d16cb8ee1d3519739e8dc3f4126c5512e3959d12
A committee report is the committee’s own explanation of the bill. PORKER lists it and links to it; reading it is up to you.
- Constitutional authority statementThe sponsor’s statement of where the Constitution gives Congress the power to pass this bill. Statement by Mr. LUETKEMEYER, as printed in the Congressional Record (Vol. 163, No. 204, December 14, 2017, Pages H9940-H9941):The constitutional authority on which this bill rests lies in Article 1, Section 7, Clause 2 of the Constitution, which allows for every bill passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate and signed by the President to be codified into law; and therefore implicitly allows Congress to repeal any bill that has been passed by both chambers and signed into law by the President. Additionally, the Constitution grants to Congress the explicit power to regulate commerce in and among the states, as enumerate in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3, the Commerce Clause.Source: Congress.gov, Congressional Record December 14, 2017 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- constitutionalAuthorityStatementText
- Statement length
- 568 characters
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 4659, 115th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/115/hr/4659
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- December 5, 2025
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 21, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
b348f346594d82e7e75da870d16cb8ee1d3519739e8dc3f4126c5512e3959d12
PORKER shows the statement exactly as printed, with the page markup removed. It is the sponsor’s claim; it is not a legal finding.
From the Congress.gov bill record for H.R. 4659, last updated December 5, 2025. PORKER’s copy was retrieved September 21, 2026 and is refreshed nightly. Open “Evidence” on any line for the record, field and file fingerprint.
Vote results
No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).
Cosponsors
17 cosponsors — 11 Republicans, 6 Democrats
6 of 17 cosponsors (35%) are from the other party.
Jodey Arrington (R-TX), K. Conaway (R-TX), Rodney Davis (R-IL), Tom Emmer (R-MN), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), J. Hill (R-AR), Randy Hultgren (R-IL), David Kustoff (R-TN), Frank Lucas (R-OK), Luke Messer (R-IN), Tom O'Halleran (D-AZ), Collin Peterson (D-MN), Austin Scott (R-GA), David Scott (D-GA), Pete Sessions (R-TX), Filemon Vela (D-TX).
More from the sponsor
Other 115th Congress bills sponsored by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer.
- H.R. 452 (115th) To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the…
- H.R. 3312 (115th) Systemic Risk Designation Improvement Act of 2017
- H.R. 2706 (115th) Financial Institution Customer Protection Act of 2017
- H.R. 4296 (115th) To place requirements on operational risk capital requirements for banking organizations established by an appropriate Federal banking…
- H.R. 2246 (115th) Taxpayer Exposure Mitigation Act of 2017
- H.R. 2565 (115th) To require the use of replacement cost value in determining the premium rates for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood…
Sponsor’s state and district
Data as of Sep 22, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.