Senate concurrent resolution · 110th Congress · Did not become law
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for American Troops in the field which would result in undermining their safety or their ability to complete their assigned mission.
Open in Bill Explorer →Where it went
- IntroducedMar 15, 2007
- Committee actionskipped
- Passed SenateMar 15, 2007 · 82–16
- Passed House—
Latest action: Mar 16, 2007 — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Vote results
No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).
Cosponsors
16 cosponsors — 16 Republicans
0 of 16 cosponsors (0%) are from the other party.
A. Allard (R-CO), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Tom Coburn (R-OK), Norm Coleman (R-MN), John Cornyn (R-TX), Larry Craig (R-ID), James DeMint (R-SC), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Chester Lott (R-MS), Mel Martinez (R-FL), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Richard Shelby (R-AL), Theodore Stevens (R-AK), John Thune (R-SD).
More from the sponsor
Other 110th Congress bills sponsored by Sen. Judd Gregg.
- S. 1142 (110th) Coastal and Estuarine Land Protection Act
- S. 2123 (110th) Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2007
- S. 15 (110th) Stop Over Spending Act of 2007
- S. 641 (110th) A bill to express the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for American troops in the field which would result in…
- S. 244 (110th) Healthy Mothers and Healthy Babies Access to Care Act
- S. 2868 (110th) A bill to amend title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act to replace the diversity visa lottery program with a program that issues…
Sponsor’s state and district
Data as of Sep 27, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.