PORKER● UT / USA
✦ Data WebOpen the app

State hub · 119th Congress

Utah in Congress

Utah is represented by 2 U.S. senators and 4 U.S. representatives. See who they are, what they have written, and where federal project money was directed.

Data as of Oct 24, 2026 · Sources: Congress.gov, House Clerk, Senate.gov, appropriations committee tables

See Utah in the app →
6Members of CongressSenate: 2 Rep. · House: 4 Rep.
302Bills they wrote119th Congress, whole delegation
16Passed a chamber4 became law
$119.4MProject funding, FY202663 projects · enacted tables only
2New laws that name Utah119th Congress · 194 since 1987

Utah’s delegation

Click any member for their full record
MemberBills writtenPassed a chamberBecame law
John CurtisU.S. Senator REP
512151 written · 2 passed a chamber · 1 lawDossier →
Mike LeeU.S. Senator REP
13100131 written · 0 passed a chamber · 0 lawDossier →
Blake MooreRep., District 1 REP
404140 written · 4 passed a chamber · 1 lawDossier →
Celeste MaloyRep., District 2 REP
223122 written · 3 passed a chamber · 1 lawDossier →
Mike KennedyRep., District 3 REP
336133 written · 6 passed a chamber · 1 lawDossier →
Burgess OwensRep., District 4 REP
251025 written · 1 passed a chamber · 0 lawDossier →

Counts are bills each member introduced as lead sponsor in the 119th Congress (ceremonial bills not counted), from PORKER’s bill records as of Oct 24, 2026. Each name opens that member’s full dossier.

Federal figures for the whole state

Two federal agencies’ published figures for Utah. They are shown as published. They are not a ranking and not a score.

TotalsPer resident (not available yet)
487,611people receiving Social Security (OASDI) benefits, Dec 2025
Source: SSA, Table 1, April 2026 ↗
Evidence
Publisher
U.S. Social Security Administration, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, “Congressional Statistics, 2025”
Table / row
Table 1; sheet 'UT - OASDI', row 5
Data as of
December 2025; released April 2026
Licence
CC0 1.0, per the Data.gov record (id US-GOV-SSA-3372; record modified April 27, 2026)
Retrieved by PORKER
October 16, 2026
Full file
cong_stats25.xlsx ↗
File SHA-256
7d31378275e2801fafd143bb96877c3407261b24767b935661ab5f915f2fe87f
30,418people receiving SSI payments, Dec 2025
Source: SSA, Table 2, April 2026 ↗
Evidence
Publisher
U.S. Social Security Administration, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, “Congressional Statistics, 2025”
Table / row
Table 2; sheet 'UT - SSI', row 6
Data as of
December 2025; released April 2026
Licence
CC0 1.0, per the Data.gov record (id US-GOV-SSA-3372; record modified April 27, 2026)
Retrieved by PORKER
October 16, 2026
Full file
cong_stats25.xlsx ↗
File SHA-256
7d31378275e2801fafd143bb96877c3407261b24767b935661ab5f915f2fe87f
$1,236,192,382VA direct expenditures, FY2025
Source: VA GDX FY2025, State Direct, September 2026 ↗
Evidence
Publisher
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics
File
GDX_FY25.xlsx, sheet "State Direct Exp", sheet 'State Direct Exp', row 48, FIPS 49
Prepared
September 2026 (per the file’s data guide)
Boundaries
119th Congress districts
Licence
U.S. government work; no licence statement found on the VA page
Retrieved by PORKER
October 16, 2026
File SHA-256
1cf95d35c842b0064eacb3055db4441a775163919a3e90d21d30d4966aefaf25
$994,274,383VA indirect expenditures, FY2025
Source: VA GDX FY2025, State Indirect, September 2026 ↗
Evidence
Publisher
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics
File
GDX_FY25.xlsx, sheet "State Indirect Exp", sheet 'State Indirect Exp', row 48, FIPS 49
Prepared
September 2026 (per the file’s data guide)
Boundaries
119th Congress districts
Licence
U.S. government work; no licence statement found on the VA page
Retrieved by PORKER
October 16, 2026
File SHA-256
1cf95d35c842b0064eacb3055db4441a775163919a3e90d21d30d4966aefaf25

By district (in district order)

Read this first. Listed by district number only. There is no sort by amount and no colour scale on purpose. Districts differ in population and age, so two districts’ totals are not comparable without a per-person figure. PORKER does not show per-resident figures for these two sources yet, so it shows totals only, and districts are always listed in district-number order, never by amount.

DistrictSocial Security (OASDI) peopleSSI peopleVA direct, FY2025VA indirect, FY2025
UT-1119,5767,761$433,988,209$308,033,000
UT-2142,6249,451$420,038,203$312,358,533
UT-3121,8247,069$224,819,348$178,599,057
UT-4103,5876,137$157,346,621$195,283,794

12 district offices are listed in the local-offices file for 6 current members from Utah. They are on each member’s page.

Source records

SourceFileWherePublishedRetrievedSHA-256 of the file
U.S. Social Security Administration, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics
Congressional Statistics, 2025 (OASDI and SSI by congressional district)
cong_stats25.xlsx ↗
398,838 bytes
Utah fact sheet, Tables 1 and 2April 2026October 16, 20267d31378275e2801fafd143bb96877c3407261b24767b935661ab5f915f2fe87f
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics
Geographic Distribution of VA Expenditures (GDX), Fiscal Year 2025
GDX_FY25.xlsx ↗
743,379 bytes
sheets "State Direct Exp", "State Indirect Exp", "CD Direct Exp", "CD Indirect Exp"September 2026October 16, 20261cf95d35c842b0064eacb3055db4441a775163919a3e90d21d30d4966aefaf25

PORKER keeps a copy of each file. The SHA-256 shown is the hash of that stored copy. The state page and the district pages read the same files.

Federal award obligations by district

Fiscal year 2025, obligations by place of performance. Tiles are in district order. They are not sorted by amount and every map uses the same colour on purpose.

Read this first. “Obligated” means the government committed the money in an award action (a contract, grant, payment or loan). It is not the same as money paid out, and not the same as “spending”. USAspending places each action in a district by the place of performance on the award. That is often where work is administered or goods are shipped from, not where people benefit, so district attribution is approximate and one large action can move a district’s figure a lot. These are totals for the district, not for its member of Congress, and PORKER never ranks members or districts by amount.

$4,049per person, all Utah districts together
$13.51 billiontotal, all districts together
All Utah districts together
$4,049 per person
All districts nationwide (50 states + DC)
$8,357 per person

How much USAspending places in a district. For FY2025, nationwide, USAspending also places this share of each state-level total in a district: contracts 100%, grants 24%, direct payments 54%, all award types 54%. The rest has no district on the award record (for example, grants to a state government or payments to individuals recorded at state level). So grant and direct-payment amounts shown for a district are only part of the picture and are not comparable with contract amounts.

Pick a district

For reference, USAspending’s own state-level total for FY2025 is $29.11 billion. It is larger than the sum of the districts ($13.51 billion) because it also includes actions placed in the state but not in a district.

Source: USAspending.gov, award search, retrieved October 19, 2026 ↗
Evidence
Publisher
U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov
What the number is
Sum of federal award-action obligations (contracts, grants, direct payments, loans) dated within the fiscal year (Oct 1 to Sep 30), by place of performance. USAspending field: spending_level=“transactions”, scope=“place_of_performance”.
What it is not
Not outlays (money paid out), not the lifetime value of awards, and a year’s net figure can be reduced by later changes that cancel earlier obligations, not spending by the district’s member, and not where the benefit lands.
Per person
Amount divided by the district population, both as supplied by USAspending in the same response (“per_capita”). PORKER does not re-compute it. USAspending does not state the population year.
Geography
UT , 119th Congress boundaries as used by USAspending. Actions with no district are not counted in any district.
API endpoint
https://api.usaspending.gov/api/v2/search/spending_by_geography/ (POST, no key needed)
Raw responses kept
usaspending-2026-10-19.jsonl.gz (481,281 bytes)
SHA-256 of stored file
d7292cfb33c8ddca4185e928c9fd6e2aba3642edb6d0cfdaf2a164d7e07a34bd
Retrieved
October 19, 2026
Sum of districts
$13,513,992,905 over 3,337,975 people

Nominees from Utah

Civilian nominations sent to the Senate, 119th Congress, that list Utah as the nominee’s state.

6nominations
Confirmed 2 (33%)Pending 4 (67%)
Source: Congress.gov, nominations, retrieved October 25, 2026 ↗
Evidence
What is counted
Civilian nominations, 119th Congress, whose first listed nominee has Utah as the state on the Congress.gov record.
Caution
The state on a nomination record is what Congress.gov lists for the nominee. It is not always where the post is located, and ambassador nominations are for posts abroad.
Find YOUR senators and your House member →Enter a ZIP in the app. Free, no account needed.

Federal project money (pork)

Where it went, who asked
Read this first. FY2026 totals use only the 8 of 12 spending areas PORKER can read so far (missing: Homeland Security (its official table is a scanned image we can’t read reliably yet), Defense, Legislative Branch, State and Foreign Operations). FY2024 uses 9 of 12 (missing: Defense, Legislative Branch, State and Foreign Operations). How we calculate →
$110.0MFY2024 projects, Utah52 enacted projects
$119.4MFY2026 so far63 projects, partial
Iron Springs Road (UT)$7.0MFY2024 · enacted
Coral Pink Sand Dunes Road Widening and Reconstruction Project (UT)$5.4MFY2024 · enacted
Mormon Trail Road Reconstruction Project (UT)$5.0MFY2024 · enacted
West Jordan 1300 West Reconstruction Project (UT)$4.5MFY2024 · enacted
Airport Apron improvements (Ogden-Hinkley Airport (OGD))$4.5MFY2024 · enacted
Sheep Bridge Road Project (Washington County, Utah)$3.9MFY2024 · enacted
Water Storage Tanks (Town of Cedar Fort, UT)$3.8MFY2024 · enacted
Highland Drive Reconstruction and Complete Streets Project (UT)$3.6MFY2024 · enacted

Totals are not adjusted for population. Largest projects are shown; each project appears in the pork section of the app with the members who requested it.

Recent laws that name Utah

Bills that became law

Newest 10 of 194 laws since 1987 whose title, official title or official summary names Utah. The date is the day the record says the bill became public law. 2 of them are from the 119th Congress.

Other states

All 56 states, districts and territories have the same page, built the same way.

Same rule for every member. Both parties are always shown, and every number links to the bill or member behind it. How we calculate →