PORKEROpen the app

House concurrent resolution · 109th Congress · Did not become law

Expressing the sense of Congress that any bill or joint resolution that provides for the establishment of a new Federal program should contain a provision that eliminates one or more current Federal programs of equal or greater cost.

H.Con.Res. 301Introduced Nov 16, 2005Policy area: Congress
Sponsor: Rep. K. Conaway R-TX
Open in Bill Explorer →

Where it went

Latest action: Nov 16, 2005 — Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

Vote results

No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).

Cosponsors

36 cosponsors — 36 Republicans

0 of 36 cosponsors (0%) are from the other party.

W. Akin (R-MO), Rob Bishop (R-UT), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Henry Bonilla (R-TX), John Carter (R-TX), John Culberson (R-TX), John Doolittle (R-CA), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Trent Franks (R-AZ), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Virgil Goode (R-VA), Gil Gutknecht (R-MN), Ralph Hall (R-TX), Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Wally Herger (R-CA), John Hostettler (R-IN), Bob Inglis (R-SC), Sam Johnson (R-TX), Jack Kingston (R-GA), Kenny Marchant (R-TX), Michael McCaul (R-TX), Patrick McHenry (R-NC), Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), Ron Paul (R-TX), Mike Pence (R-IN), Tom Price (R-GA), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), John Schwarz (R-MI) and 6 more.

More from the sponsor

Other 109th Congress bills sponsored by Rep. K. Conaway.

Sponsor’s state and district

Texas in Congress · TX-11 district

Open in Bill Explorer →

Data as of Sep 27, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.