Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Newdow v. United States Congress is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the first amendment and should be overturned, and for other purposes.

Cost and committee reports

Official records Congress.gov attaches to H.Res. 132.

• Committee reportCongress.gov lists 1 committee report for this bill: H. Rept. 108-41 ↗. The Congress.gov committee record lists a “Reported By” entry for the Judiciary Committee on March 18, 2003.
  Source: Congress.gov, reported March 18, 2003 ↗

  Evidence

  Field in the Congress.gov record

  committeeReports

  Report API records

  https://api.congress.gov/v3/committee-report/108/HRPT/41

  Congress.gov bill record

  H.Res. 132, 108th Congress

  Congress.gov API record

  https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/108/hres/132

  Record last updated by Congress.gov

  April 7, 2025

  PORKER copy retrieved

  September 28, 2026

  Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file

  7c7d0d801314804f6f8dd6efcae8ceb35849a6e14fabc26cd28684978e90cccd

  A committee report is the committee’s own explanation of the bill. PORKER lists it and links to it; reading it is up to you.

Congress.gov’s record for this bill does not list a CBO cost estimate (as of April 7, 2025). Not every bill gets one.

From the Congress.gov bill record for H.Res. 132, last updated April 7, 2025. PORKER’s copy was retrieved September 28, 2026 and is refreshed nightly. Open “Evidence” on any line for the record, field and file fingerprint.