PORKEROpen the app

House resolution · 107th Congress · Latest step: Passed House

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Newdow v. U.S. Congress was erroneously decided, and for other purposes.

H.Res. 459Introduced Jun 26, 2002Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
Sponsor: Rep. F. Sensenbrenner R-WI
Open in Bill Explorer →

Where it went

Latest action: Jun 27, 2002 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Vote results

No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).

Cosponsors

182 cosponsors — 163 Republicans, 19 Democrats

20 of 182 cosponsors (11%) are from the other party.

Robert Aderholt (R-AL), W. Akin (R-MO), Dick Armey (R-TX), Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Richard Baker (R-LA), Cass Ballenger (R-NC), Bob Barr (R-GA), Joe Barton (R-TX), Charles Bass (R-NH), Judy Biggert (R-IL), Henry Bonilla (R-TX), Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), John Boozman (R-AR), Kevin Brady (R-TX), Henry Brown (R-SC), Ed Bryant (R-TN), Richard Burr (R-NC), Stephen Buyer (R-IN), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Dave Camp (R-MI), Chris Cannon (R-UT), Eric Cantor (R-VA), Shelley Capito (R-WV), Michael Castle (R-DE), Steve Chabot (R-OH), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Howard Coble (R-NC), Mac Collins (R-GA), Gary Condit (D-CA), John Cooksey (R-LA) and 152 more.

More from the sponsor

Other 107th Congress bills sponsored by Rep. F. Sensenbrenner.

Sponsor’s state and district

Wisconsin in Congress

Open in Bill Explorer →

Data as of Sep 28, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.