House bill · 106th Congress · Did not become law
Where it went
- IntroducedMar 2, 1999
- Committee actionMar 16, 2000
- Passed HouseMar 28, 2000 · by voice vote
- Passed Senate—
- To the President—
- Became law—
Latest action: Mar 29, 2000 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Cost and committee reports
Official records Congress.gov attaches to H.R. 910.
- CBO cost estimateThe Congressional Budget Office published “H.R. 910, San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Initiative” on March 23, 2000. CBO’s description reads “Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Transporatation and Infrastructure on March 16, 2000”.Read the CBO estimate ↗Source: Congressional Budget Office, March 23, 2000 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- cboCostEstimates
- CBO publication
- https://www.cbo.gov/publication/12152
- CBO publication date
- March 23, 2000
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 910, 106th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/106/hr/910
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- September 8, 2026
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 14, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
1b9ca3c4ed1ffd154bb12029480d54bb373f7f34dcc38d70405964df510e25f9
PORKER links to the estimate and does not repeat its dollar figures. Each estimate is for the version of the bill its description names; the bill may have changed since.
- Committee reportCongress.gov lists 1 committee report for this bill: H. Rept. 106-545 ↗. The Congress.gov committee record lists a “Reported By” entry for the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on March 24, 2000.Source: Congress.gov, reported March 24, 2000 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- committeeReports
- Report API records
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/committee-report/106/HRPT/545
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 910, 106th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/106/hr/910
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- September 8, 2026
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 14, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
1b9ca3c4ed1ffd154bb12029480d54bb373f7f34dcc38d70405964df510e25f9
A committee report is the committee’s own explanation of the bill. PORKER lists it and links to it; reading it is up to you.
From the Congress.gov bill record for H.R. 910, last updated September 8, 2026. PORKER’s copy was retrieved September 14, 2026 and is refreshed nightly. Open “Evidence” on any line for the record, field and file fingerprint.
Vote results
No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).
Cosponsors
7 cosponsors — 5 Republicans, 2 Democrats
3 of 7 cosponsors (43%) are from the other party.
Steve Horn (R-CA), Matthew Martinez (R-CA), Howard McKeon (R-CA), Gary Miller (R-CA), Grace Napolitano (D-CA), James Rogan (R-CA), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA).
More from the sponsor
Other 106th Congress bills sponsored by Rep. David Dreier.
- H.R. 5362 (106th) To increase the amount of fees charged to employers who are petitioners for the employment of H-1B non-immigrant workers, and for other…
- H.J.Res. 80 (106th) Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.
- H.Res. 114 (106th) Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 975) to provide for a reduction in the volume of steel imports, and to establish a steel…
- H.Res. 142 (106th) Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1184) to authorize appropriations for carrying out the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of…
- H.Res. 151 (106th) Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1569) to prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense from being used…
- H.Res. 166 (106th) Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought for damages relating to the…
Sponsor’s state and district
Data as of Sep 28, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.