House bill · 106th Congress · Did not become law
Local Census Quality Check Act
Open in Bill Explorer →Where it went
- IntroducedFeb 2, 1999
- Committee actionMar 17, 1999
- Passed HouseApr 14, 1999 · 223–206
- Passed Senate—
- To the President—
- Became law—
Latest action: Apr 15, 1999 — Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Cost and committee reports
Official records Congress.gov attaches to H.R. 472.
- CBO cost estimateThe Congressional Budget Office published “H.R. 472, Local Census Quality Check Act” on March 19, 1999. CBO’s description reads “Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Government Reform on March 17, 1999”.Read the CBO estimate ↗Source: Congressional Budget Office, March 19, 1999 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- cboCostEstimates
- CBO publication
- https://www.cbo.gov/publication/11446
- CBO publication date
- March 19, 1999
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 472, 106th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/106/hr/472
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- April 7, 2025
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 28, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
68d84b4985fe925df6c408fc58478a7be39e26c69c2964b043d160f1a938a7d2
PORKER links to the estimate and does not repeat its dollar figures. Each estimate is for the version of the bill its description names; the bill may have changed since.
- Committee reportCongress.gov lists 1 committee report for this bill: H. Rept. 106-71 ↗. The Congress.gov committee record lists a “Reported By” entry for the Oversight and Government Reform Committee on March 19, 1999.Source: Congress.gov, reported March 19, 1999 ↗
Evidence
- Field in the Congress.gov record
- committeeReports
- Report API records
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/committee-report/106/HRPT/71
- Congress.gov bill record
- H.R. 472, 106th Congress
- Congress.gov API record
- https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/106/hr/472
- Record last updated by Congress.gov
- April 7, 2025
- PORKER copy retrieved
- September 28, 2026
- Stored copy, SHA-256 of the file
68d84b4985fe925df6c408fc58478a7be39e26c69c2964b043d160f1a938a7d2
A committee report is the committee’s own explanation of the bill. PORKER lists it and links to it; reading it is up to you.
From the Congress.gov bill record for H.R. 472, last updated April 7, 2025. PORKER’s copy was retrieved September 28, 2026 and is refreshed nightly. Open “Evidence” on any line for the record, field and file fingerprint.
Vote results
No recorded roll-call votes on this bill in PORKER’s records (voice votes and unanimous consent are not roll calls; roll-call records start in 2011).
Cosponsors
22 cosponsors — 22 Republicans
0 of 22 cosponsors (0%) are from the other party.
Dan Burton (R-IN), Larry Combest (R-TX), Philip Crane (R-IL), Thomas Davis (R-VA), Jay Dickey (R-AR), John Doolittle (R-CA), Phil English (R-PA), Mark Foley (R-FL), Benjamin Gilman (R-NY), Porter Goss (R-FL), James Greenwood (R-PA), J. Hayworth (R-AZ), Tom Latham (R-IA), John Mica (R-FL), Sue Myrick (R-NC), Tom Petri (R-WI), Paul Ryan (R-WI), John Shadegg (R-AZ), E. Shaw (R-FL), Mark Souder (R-IN), Lee Terry (R-NE), Dave Weldon (R-FL).
More from the sponsor
Other 106th Congress bills sponsored by Rep. Dan Miller.
- H.Con.Res. 193 (106th) Expressing the support of Congress for activities to increase public participation in the decennial census.
- H.Con.Res. 121 (106th) Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the victory of the United States in the cold war and the fall of the Berlin Wall.
- H.R. 929 (106th) 2000 Census Language Barrier Removal Act
- H.R. 1009 (106th) 2000 Census Community Participation Enhancement Act
- H.R. 1010 (106th) To improve participation in the 2000 decennial census by increasing the amounts available to the Bureau of the Census for marketing…
- H.R. 1058 (106th) Census in the Schools Promotion Act
Sponsor’s state and district
Data as of Sep 28, 2026 · bill record checked by PORKER from Congress.gov · votes from Senate.gov and the House Clerk. PORKER is non-partisan.